Thursday, January 8, 2009

It's Hitler's fault, too...

This came from MUS as part of his comment on Balfour Declaration which led to the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine. Thanks, bro...

This was what Adolf Hitler said to one of his senior officers sometime in 1939:

"If I am ever really in power, the destruction of the Jews will be my first and most important job. As soon as I have power, I shall have gallows after gallows erected, for example, in Munich on the Marienplatz-as many of them as traffic allows. Then the Jews will be hanged one after another, and they will stay hanging until they stink. They will stay hanging as long as hygienically possible. As soon as they are untied, then the next group will follow and that will continue until the last Jew in Munich is exterminated. Exactly the same procedure will be followed in other cities until Germany is cleansed of the last Jew!"

But no thanks to Hitler, the New World Orde with the establishment of the United Nations, does not allow the Jews to be punished. Hitler had his own reasons.

However, justifications are very much needed. The UN and its Security Council have always been restricted in passing any resolution that condemns Israeli assault on the Palestinians. Tel Aviv, on the other hand, always act on its own perill.

From being offered a place to settle down in 1917, the Jews became conquerers after unilaterally declaring its independence in 1948. The agony of the Palestinians started immediately after that when the Jews gradually took their land by force.

The architects behind such moves - Britain and US - remain adament until now each time the plight of the oppressed Palestinians are brought up at the UN. Having vetoed so many resolutions, both were never serious with their words of helping to solve the conflict.


AKONG said...

hitler did it right. although it was another set of world crime, it justified.

LINDA, kuching said...

i dont hate the jews but i hate what they did to the palestinians.

they came to palestine at the mercy of the palestinians but later made the land of palestine as theirs by oppressing them.

after their independence, they should recognise the rights of the palestinians for a state too.

sadikin said...

PBB tidak mampu berbuat apa2 dalam hal ini kerana setiausaha agungnya dan pertubuhan yang ada cuma menjadi mainan amerika.

adalah lebih elok kuasa arab sendiri bersatu memerangi israel sekaligus.

malangnya, arab sendiri tidak bersatu dan berpuak-puak

Anonymous said...



bujai said...


its not the way to find amicable solution to the arab-israel conflict.

launching another will only lead to others. the world will be split into two, and of course many will be on israel side.

diplomatic means are still prudent in resolving it. the only thing that matters is the slow-pace of the united nations to act without having to bother to US veto



Tahniah atas kejayaan saudara dalam memperjuangkan IJN tempohari.

Perjuangan kita kali ini ialah untuk membantah sekeras-kerasnya pembangunan KLIA@EAST di Labu oleh Sime Darby dan Air Asia. Ini adalah satu percubaan untuk "membunuh" KLIA di Sepang yang dibina oleh YABhg Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad. Tun Musa Hitam sebagai pengerusi Sime Darby ingin menggagalkan semua legasi Tun Dr Mahathir. Saya harap saudara boleh melawat blog saya iaitu Saya telah memaparkan logo "No to KLIA@EAST". Saya harap saudara akan juga menggunakan logo itu di website saudara. Terima kasih.


Anonymous said...

as long as the UN is based in New York, no country (apart from US and its allies) will benefit from it.

bujai said...


i agree that the UN headquarters should be shifted to a free and neutral ground... but where?

i will post my interview with libyan leader muammar gaddafi in 1986 about such a plan he proposed then.


si pitak said...

i didnt support hitler's brutality against the jews during the world war, neither do i like what the jews are doing on the palestinians today.

we need to bring the two parties to the round table again.

just hoping for obama to announce his plan for the middle east

Anonymous said...

Bro Jai,

Perhaps one should analyse why there is so much hatred towards the Jews.
Although I do not condone putting live human beings into ovens, I would like to know what drove Hitler to such hatred that he did not even bat an eyelid before instructing the German SS to carry out the order on Jews in Germany, Poland, and Austria.
Perhaps Hitler was jealous of the Jews' success at the time in Germany, perhaps he was using the Jewish issue as a unifying factor for Germans to establish his Aryan empire or perhaps Hitler knew what to expect if the Jews are allowed flourish. I really do not know but based on what has been happening in Palestine, I am sometimes inclined to believe the last possible reason.


Mr.KETAM said...

Doc this is a very interesting facts!!

Berikut disiarkan petikan dari blog Anwar Ibrahim pertanyaan seorang pembaca mengenai penglibatan Anwar dalam 'Annapolis Summit '

Munirah Hayati menanyakan: Saya berpendapat, selain dari sejarah keganasan Zionis yg sudah berzaman, mutakhir ini US & Israel merasa terancam kerana Hamas menjadi pilihan rakyat melalui pilihanraya di palestin pada 2006 @ 2007 kalau saya tidak silap. US tidak mengiktiraf Hamas kerana katanya Hamas adalah pertubuhan ‘teroris’

Now, based on history any reasonable and fair-minded person will realise, when they look beyond the propaganda line - the Zionists are a much much bigger ‘terrorist’ than Hamas, which is a small, very powerless group of people fighting for their own ‘right of return’ & ‘liberation of Al-Aqsa’

You, Anwar Ibrahim - has been part of the Annapolis Summit in November 2007 - clearly in support of America and their denouncement of Hamas. I wish i can understand why you decided to be part of that. News report from AlJazeera now link the current offensive (i call it genocide & massacre by terrorist Zionist) as a result of careful planning and years of “peaceful negotiation” by US and other countries in summits that are not attended by the legitimate government of the people of Palestine. I pray to Allah every hands that go into the planning of the current massacre will justly be cursed in this life & the next wassalam —–


Saudari Munirah, Saya kurang pasti siapa yang sasau menyebar dakyah sebegini dengan dendam kesumat sademikian. Mungkin hasil latihan fitnah BTN! Secara konsisten saya menggesa pengiktirafan ke atas HAMAS dan menegur pimpinan UMNO-BN kerana mengenepikan wakil HAMAS di Kuala Lumpur. Saya tidak pernah menyentuh apa lagi mendukung Annapolis Summit.


Kenapa Anwar ingin menyalahkan orang lain atau pun BTN tentang tindakkannya menandatangani perjanjian tersebut. Adakah hebat sangat BTN sehingga boleh mempengaruhi akhbar di luar negara untuk menyiarkan berita tersebut. Adakah Anwar sudah tersilap langkah hingga ingin menyalahkan orang lain.

STEVEN CLEMONS dalam The Washington Note mengesahkan ANWAR IBRAHIM, bekas Timbalan Perdana Menteri Malaysia turut sama menandatangani surat 'sokongan' deklarasi "Annapolis Summit" kepada Presiden George W. Bush dan Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, pada 10 October 2007. ANWAR IBRAHIM dilaporkan telah menandatangani surat 'sokongan' deklarasi itu sebaris dengan JOHN McLAUGHLIN, bekas Timbalan Pengarah CIA; SHLOMO BEN-AMI, bekas Menteri Luar Negara Israel; HARRIET BABBITT bekas Pengarah NDI; JOHN MALOTT, bekas Duta US; CHRISTOPHER PATTEN, Co-Chair of ICG; STEVEN CLEMONS, Pengarah, New America Foundation dan lain-lain lagi.

Semua nama-nama itu merupakah bekas-bekas tokoh berpengaruh kerajaan Amerika dan tokoh luar negara yang pro Amerika. Sudah semestinya tokoh-tokoh Amerika itu sudah mengenali siapakah Anwar Ibrahim dan mengetahui atas alasan apa bekas Timbalan Perdana Menteri Malaysia turut dijemput menandatangani surat deklarasi itu.

Persoalan : 1. Anwar Ibrahim mewakili kepentingan pihak mana dalam menandatangani surat 'sokongan' deklarasi Annapolis Summit itu ? Kepentingan Kerajaan AMERIKA atau Negara ISLAM ?

2. Atas kapasiti apa Anwar tandatangani surat itu ? Diplomat Jemputan Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Ahli kehormat International Crisis Group (ICJ), United States Middle East Project (USMEP)atau bekas Timbalan Perdana Menteri Malaysia ?

3. Dengan persetujuan menurunkan tandatangan deklarasi itu, bermakna Anwar telah mengiktiraf kewujudan NEGARA ISRAEL sebagai sebuah negara yang SAH ?

4. Kenapa majoriti yang menandatangani deklarasi itu terdiri daripada tokoh-tokoh Amerika yang bukan beragama Islam ? Hanya Anwar dan 4 lain beragama Islam sedangkan 77 orang pula bukan beragama Islam ?

5. Kenapa deklarasi sokongan Annapolis Summit diketuai 8 tokoh yang berpengaruh di Amerika iaitu Zbigniew Brzezinski, Lee H. Hamilton, Carla Hills, Nancy Kassebaum-Baker, Thomas R. Pickering, Brent Scowcroft, Theodore C Sorenson dan Paul Volcker?

6. Kenapa nama Anwar dimasukkan sebagai senarai kedua bersama tokoh-tokoh badan perisikan, penajaan dan ejen iaitu Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), International Crisis Group (ICG), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), United States Agency for International Development (USAID), National Democratic Institute (NDI), United States Middle East Project (USMEP), The New American Foundation, Brookings Institution, Open Society Institute, National Intelligence Council, RAND Corporation dan National Security Council ?

7. Adakah badan-badan perisikan, penajaan dan ejen seperti yang disenaraikan di atas sebelum ini pernah terlibat secara langsung (overt) dan tidak langsung (covert) ke atas negara-negara Islam ?

8. Kenapa pula negara Syria dan HAMAS serta majoriti penduduk Palestin menentang 'pelan damai' itu yang dianggap sebagai sangat menguntungkan Israel ?

9. Benarkah dakwaan HAMAS mengatakan Ayatollah Sayed Ali Khamenei (Iran) tidak bersetuju dengan Annapolis Summit dan menyeru dunia Arab memboikotnya.

10. Benarkah Anwar bersama empat orang Islam itu sangat pro-Amerika hingga sanggup membelakangkan kepentingan HAMAS dan majoriti penduduk Palestin yang beragama Islam?

11. Betulkah dakwaan laman web Moon of Alabama menuduh yayasan yang pernah dipegang oleh Anwar, (Foundation For The Future)merupakan grand design Amerika untuk bantu bekalkan senjata kepada kumpulan ABBAS (FATAH) menentang kumpulan HAMAS ? Kumpulan HAMAS dan majoriti penduduk Palestin menolak 'pelan damai' Annapolis Summit

12. Kalau tuduhan laman web Moon of Alabama tidak benar, kenapakah STEVEN CLEMONS,(salah seorang penandatangan surat deklarasi Annapolis Summit 2007) dalam The Washington Note mengesahkan Foundation For The Future merupakan tajaan AMERIKA menjalankan operasi misteri yang hanya diketahui oleh Jabatan Negara Amerika ?

13. Kalau Foundation For The Future adalah tajaan AMERIKA, adakah Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) dan International Crisis Group (ICJ)yang dipegang oleh Anwar sekarang ini juga merupakan 'tajaan' AMERIKA ?

14. Bukankah usaha AMERIKA 'mendamaikan' antara Ehud Olmert (Israel) dan Abbas (Palestin)sebagai usaha untuk menafikan kemenangan kumpulan HAMAS yang pernah memenangi pilihanraya Palestin sebelum ini ?.

15. Bukankah 'perjanjian damai' antara Israel dan kumpulan Abbas bertujuan untuk menyemarakkan lagi rasa tidak puas hati kumpulan HAMAS kepada Abbas ?

16. Apakah bermaksud, dengan termenterai perjanjian ini, Israel boleh cuci tangan kerana peperangan akan terus berlarutan sesama Islam iaitu antara HAMAS dan FATAH.

17. Kalau begitu, betulkah dakwaan mengatakan "Abbas" merupakan Presiden Palestin, BONEKA Israel dan Amerika ?

18. Betulkah dakwaan Ahmadinejad, Presiden Iran mengatakan Annapolis Summit merupakan projek Amerika yang gagal dan sangat bahaya kepada dunia Islam ?

19. Kalau benar, Israel sudah mula 'angkat bendera putih' dan mahu berdamai dengan negara-negara Islam, kenapakah Israel hasut Amerika supaya serang Iran yang didakwa mempunyai senjata nuklear?

20. Jadi, apa sebenarnya KONSPIRASI di sebalik tabir sedang dimainkan oleh Amerika, Israel dan Anwar Ibrahim yang turut membawa imejnya sebagai "Bekas Timbalan Perdana Menteri Malaysia"?